Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

On Your Marks for Testing Bluetooth

The imminent market explosion of Bluetooth wireless interfaces on products signals an RF measurement first for many test engineers.

Angus Robinson, Anritsu, Stevenage, UK -- Test & Measurement World, 9/1/2000

A version of this article previously appeared in the June-July issue of Test & Measurement Europe.

The Bluetooth wireless standard is coming into its own, and hundreds of millions of Bluetooth-enabled products will ship by the end of 2002. The Bluetooth technology will be self-contained within many products; for others, it will be an addition in the form of a PC Card that plugs into a mobile device or a dongle that plugs in to a desktop system’s RS-232 or parallel-printer port. As Bluetooth becomes ubiquitous, you’ll find yourself having to test Bluetooth devices at the protocol-stack and RF levels.

A complete Bluetooth module comprises a radio transceiver, a baseband link controller, and a link manager (Fig. 1). The baseband link controller connects the radio hardware to the baseband-processing and physical protocol layer. The link manager performs high-level protocol activities such as link setup, authentication, and configuration. Application layer software sits above the link manager.

A Bluetooth implementation can operate as a single-chip (integrating both radio and protocol stack) or multi-chip (separate radio and protocol ICs) design. Cellular-phone manufacturers may wish to combine the Bluetooth baseband function in the same device as the GSM baseband function, and therefore will want a separate Bluetooth radio. A digital camera manufacturer is more likely to select a single-chip design to simplify assembly.

RF, Protocol, & Profiles
Three aspects of a Bluetooth module need testing: RF, protocol, and profiles. You can perform many of the RF measurements with standard test instruments such as spectrum analyzers with vector demodulation, transmitter analyzers, power meters, digital-signal generators, and bit-error-rate testers (BERTs).

Some of the measurements, however, require the radio to form a standard Bluetooth radio link connection with the test instrument and for the test instrument to have some degree of control over the equipment under test (Fig. 2). For these tests, the test system must be able to support the Bluetooth protocol to make the link. Consequently, you can expect instrument vendors to develop new test instruments similar to the integrated radio test sets for digital cellular radio.

For protocol tests, you can use protocol sniffers that monitor and display data moving between Bluetooth devices. You can also use products such as the Ericsson Bluetooth Development Kit (EBDK).1 Ericsson will soon release a version of the EBDK, known as a Blue Unit, that will include software for use during early qualification testing. Eventually, some companies should develop complete reference test systems.

TMW000901_F2FIG2.gif (15007 bytes)

Figure 1. A complete Bluetooth module comprises a radio transceiver, a baseband link controller, and a link manager.
TMW000901_F2FIG3.gif (14381 bytes)
Figure 2. Some Bluetooth tests require the test instrument to support the Bluetooth protocol in order to form a standard Bluetooth radio link connection.
 A profile is the application level protocol that makes a device perform its functions as a user expects. All Bluetooth devices that claim to offer a given functionality must use the appropriate profile from the Bluetooth specification. This requirement ensures interoperability between common devices from multiple vendors.

For example, the LAN access profile defines a data connection between a data terminal (DT) and a LAN access point (LAP). The profile defines the following services and connection states for the application layer: initialization of LAN access service, shutdown of LAN access service, establishment of LAN connection, loss of LAN connection, and disconnection of LAN connection.

Until a reference test system is available, early Bluetooth profile testing will require product-to-product interoperability testing. To facilitate this, a series of “Unplugfests” have been arranged by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (www.bluetooth.com). At these meetings, companies with functional products can test product interoperability against products from other suppliers.

RF Measurements
The Bluetooth radio specification states the required performance of the radio and the test that must be made to confirm conformance (Table 1). To measure the performance of a Bluetooth module, the test instrumentation must be able to establish a Bluetooth link with the equipment under test (EUT). It can then put the EUT into test mode. Test mode is a mandatory feature of a Bluetooth module in which the EUT can enter a loopback mode or can disable frequency hopping (for example, for making BER measurements). A Bluetooth test system should also be able to disable hopping, set specific frequencies for tests, and control the transmit power level.

During design and development, you’ll want to test the radio in isolation from the protocol stack that controls it. In these cases, you need to be able to control the radio so you can set frequencies and levels to make raw transceiver measurements. You can then feed the radio output directly into a spectrum analyzer with vector signal analysis or into a transmitter analyzer and power meter to make the measurements (Fig. 3). The measurements you can make will vary according to the control that the radio IC manufacturer provides over the IC connectors. The radio will have inputs controlling data in and out, TX on, clocks, and supply voltage. Without a protocol stack, the radio may not function at all.

Figure 3. In development, you make raw transceiver measurements of a Bluetooth radio IC in isolation from the protocol stack.
Many radio designs permit you to feed pseudo-random bit sequences (PRBS) into the transmitter modulator and use manufacturer-specific control lines to force the radio to transmit continuously at a single frequency. Doing so enables you to make frequency, power, and modulation measurements as well as all of the output spectrum measurements. An alternative method for radio IC testing is to build a test jig that holds the radio IC and has a protocol stack built onto it. This method allows for comprehensive testing and simulates the integrated module approach outlined below.

Single Chip Measurements
There is no standard for the interface between a protocol stack and a radio, typically known as the radio interface. You must use a test fixture to hold the radio IC and provide it with some baseband control to give Bluetooth functionality. This arrangement lets you then test radio ICs with a Bluetooth link and baseband control.

The connection between the radio and the test instrument will vary depending upon the Bluetooth device implementation. Some radios or integrated modules have printed antennas as part of the design. In this case, it may only be possible to make a connection over the air to an antenna on the test instrument input. If you use this approach, then you must characterize the path loss for each of the 79 Bluetooth frequencies. If the radio IC has an RF output connector, a direct connection to the test instrument simplifies calibrated power and sensitivity measurements. Even if you use a direct connection, though, you should measure and correct for the path loss at each frequency.

Testing OEM Bluetooth Products
OEMs buying commercial Bluetooth chip sets will still need to test. Inevitably, packaging will influence the performance of a finished product because of the positioning of the antenna as well as other internal electronics. In a mobile phone, the other electronics will, by definition, include an interfering radio transceiver. Similarly, PCs have high-speed clocks or noisy buses that could degrade module sensitivity.

In the OEM production environment, the tests will have to validate performance in the shortest possible time. Production engineers will need to select the subset of the conformance test specifications that are appropriate for their products’ requirements.

To confirm that the device will operate over the Bluetooth specification’s 10-m range, engineers will still need to measure sensitivity and power levels. The conformance specification requires receiver sensitivity to be measured as a BER of more than 1,600,000 bits at three frequencies. This test alone would take at least 25 s using standard single-slot (DH1) packets and so, in practice, the test will measure fewer bits even at a reduced number of frequencies.

In addition to RF measurements, OEMs should perform some form of functional test. In the case of a
Bluetooth-enabled digital camera, for example, this could be sending an instruction over the Bluetooth interface to activate a shutter release with flash. This command would need to be created at a high level in the protocol stack (typically the application level) and packaged by the test equipment into the Bluetooth format. Validating the camera’s response to a high-level command would give the manufacturer confidence that the interface was functioning correctly, although it is not necessarily a guarantee of robust performance. T&MW

FOOTNOTE
1. Available from Symbionics. www.symbionics.co.uk/solutions/bluetooth/Bluetoothkit.shtml.

Angus Robinson is product marketing manager for RF and microwave test instruments with Anritsu, Stevenage, UK. He joined Anritsu in 1998 having previously worked with Marconi Instruments (now IFR) after receiving a B Eng degree in electronics at Liverpool University in 1982.  
How to Qualify Products with Bluetooth Interfaces

No product may be sold as “Bluetooth enabled” without first demonstrating compliance with the Bluetooth specification. You can do this according to the rules laid out in the Bluetooth Qualification Program. Qualification is seen as being essential to ensure that consumers get a good experience of using Bluetooth-branded products. Interoperability between products supplied by differing manufacturers must be guaranteed.
  To obtain qualification, a manufacturer must first become a Bluetooth Member by signing the Adopters Agreement. There are then two further bodies that come into play to qualify a product—a Bluetooth Qualification Test Facility (BQTF) and a Bluetooth Qualification Body (BQB).
  A BQTF is an accredited organization that has the skills and equipment to test a product to the Bluetooth specification. A BQTF may choose not to offer qualification for every aspect of the Bluetooth standard. For example, many profiles are limited to a few specific applications, and some aspects of the Bluetooth specification are optional. The BQTF performs measurements on behalf of the manufacturer on the appropriate radio, protocol, and profiles for the equipment under test. The BQTF then prepares a test report that forms part of a compliance folder that is submitted to the BQB.
  The role of the BQB is to review all submitted documentation and ensure that all the appropriate tests have been performed and passed satisfactorily. If all is well, the product is then listed as Bluetooth qualified and may be sold as Bluetooth enabled.—Angus Robinson

Background to Bluetooth
Parameter Specification Comments
Link Type Synchronous Connection Oriented (SCO).


Asynchronous Connectionless Link (ACL).

Point-to-point, full duplex link. Circuit switched, symmetric with fixed- interval slot reservation.

Momentary connection. Packet  switching asynchronous with polling access.
Frequency ISM band, 2.402 GHz to 2.480 GHz. 79 channels—1-MHz spacing. Hopping at 1600 hops/s.
Now a common frequency plan including France, Spain, and
Japan.
Modulation 2 FSK with 0.5 Bandwidth Time Gaussian filter. Peak deviation 175 kHz. Modulation index 0.28 to 0.35.   
Data Rate 1 Msymbol gross. Maximum net data rate 721 kbps. Voice channel 64 kbps. Actual data rate depends upon packet length, use of error correction, and encryption.
Transmitter Power Class 1, P >0 dBm. Class 2, P –6 to +4 dBm. Class 3, P <0 dBm.   

Bluetooth is a standard for wireless communication between multiple devices that supports both voice and data. In 1994, Ericsson began to develop the standard at its Lund site in Sweden. The project was initially called MC Link (multi-communicator link). In 1997, Ericsson approached other companies that were considered to have a mutual interest in defining an open standard for a wireless link. In February 1998, five promoters—Ericsson, IBM, Intel, Nokia, and Toshiba—formed the Special Interest Group (SIG) to promote the standard, which they renamed Bluetooth.
  The Bluetooth SIG announced the standard on May 20, 1998. Two years later, more than 1800 companies had joined the consortium as adopters of the technology. The consortium’s objective is to create a de facto short-range wireless communication standard that all companies could use. In the autumn of 1999, the promoter group was expanded to nine companies, adding 3Com, Lucent Technologies, Microsoft, and Motorola. Although the Bluetooth SIG standard is “owned” today by the promoter group, it is expected that the standard will become an IEEE standard (802.15) this year and remain fundamentally the same.
  Bluetooth offers wireless communication between one or more devices over a 10-m range with a maximum gross data rate of 721 kbps in the unlicensed 2.4-GHz ISM band. Its purpose is to offer a low-cost, simple-to-use alternative to wired connections. As such, the potential user base is large and varied.
  The first adopters of the technology are expected to be mobile phone manufacturers with wireless headsets. Mobile phones could also interface with a Bluetooth-enabled PCs to exchange files or e-mail. A PC could have a wireless mouse and keyboard, and office printers could become Bluetooth enabled so that wireless printing is possible in any location. Other early adopters of the technology include personal digital assistants (PDAs), LAN access points, digital cameras, and security access cards.—Angus Robinson

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no other articles written by this author.

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts

Blogs

  • Martin Rowe
    Rowe's and Columns

    August 11, 2008
    Grachanen wins NCSLI award
    At last week's NCSL International Workshop and Symposium, Chris Grachanen was awarded the NCSLI Educ...
    More
  • Martin Rowe
    Rowe's and Columns

    August 8, 2008
    Have you seen Test Ideas?
    The August print issue of T&MW features a new column called "Test Ideas." For this fir...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Test Industry News (3 Times Per Month)
Machine-Vision & Inspection (Monthly)
Communications Test (Monthly)
Design, Test & Yield (Monthly)
Automotive, Aerospace & Defense (Monthly)
Instrumentation (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites