Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Pain Fighters

Tests help NeuroControl's engineers design an electrical stimulator to ease the suffering of stroke patients.

Lawrence D. Maloney, Editorial Director -- Test & Measurement World, 4/1/2003

Close-up of an FES innovation lab
Partners in Test
For patients, a measure of relief
Some tips on selecting test chambers

Cleveland, OH—In the US alone, about 400,000 stroke victims must live with severe and persistent shoulder pain—the result of paralysis that causes the upper arm to sag and pull out of the shoulder socket. What's more, some 50,000 new cases appear each year.

Engineers at NeuroControl Corp., a startup company backed by Cleveland medical giant Invacare, believe they can bring relief with a new electrical stimulator called the RestoreStIM system. During years of design work, the development team relied heavily on testing equipment that included DMMs, scopes, power supplies, environmental chambers, ESD guns, and other instruments. Result: An effective low-power therapeutic device that has already received Europe's CE mark and is now awaiting FDA clearance. The pager-size external stimulator provides targeted pulse therapy via four electrodes implanted in the shoulder muscles.

Dr. John Chae (right), a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist, and engineer Zi-Ping Fang, VP of R&D for NeuroControl.



RestoreStIM can replace treatments such as slings, lapboards, steroid injections, exercises, and electrical surface stimulation of the muscles. Clinicians say that these techniques often fall short, both in relieving pain and in restoring muscle function. Surface stimulation, in fact, often worsens the pain, while requiring the services of a therapist to position the electrodes for each day's therapy.

In contrast, RestoreStIM requires minimal involvement of healthcare personnel after the initial implant and programming of the device, and clinical studies show marked reduction in shoulder pain after the typical six-week therapy regimen (see "For patients, a measure of relief ").

Clinical and engineering partnership

Bringing RestoreStIM from idea to reality required close cooperation between NeuroControl engineers, led by VP of R&D Zi-Ping Fang, and clinical professionals, directed by Dr. John Chae, a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist at Cleveland's MetroHealth Medical Center. Both men have strong ties to Case Western Reserve University, a world-class center for research in functional electrical stimulation (FES) for restoring movement in individuals paralyzed by spinal cord injuries and similar motor impairments.

Fang, who has a BS in electrical engineering, received his PhD in biomedical engineering at Case Western and did post doctoral studies in neuroscience there. Chae, whose undergraduate degree is in bioengineering, came to Cleveland in 1994 after his medical residency to work with Case Western biomedical engineer Hunter Peckham, a leader in FES technology. "Nowhere else in this country do you see the kind of cooperation that you have here in Cleveland between clinicians and engineers," says Dr. Chae. "There's a great desire to learn from one another."

Fang and Chae were both very familiar with the use of electrical stimulation to induce hand movement in patients paralyzed by spinal cord injuries. In fact, NeuroControl earned FDA marketing approval in 1997 for Freehand, an FES system originally developed by Peckham and his team to enable patients to grasp objects, perform personal care, and do other tasks (see "Close-up of an FES innovation lab ").

Figure 1 RestoreStIM features four implanted electrodes linked to an external stimulator. Pulse-width modulation delivers the stimulus needed to contract muscles, bringing relief from pain and improving range of motion. Courtesy of NeuroControl.



But for relief of shoulder pain from stroke, the clinicians and engineering design team didn't need an implanted stimulator, such as the Freehand system. With patient therapy lasting for only a few weeks, they could adopt a far less invasive solution of implanting electrodes connected to an external stimulator (Figure 1).

Even so, they had to come up with a design dramatically different from early stimulator systems developed at Case Western, which used a brick-size external stimulator weighing 1.1 kg attached to external wires leading through the skin to implanted electrodes. Recalls Fang: "I wanted a stimulator that would fit inside a conventional pocket pager."

Anatomy of RestoreStIM

Working with Soheyl Pourmehdi, NeuroControl's director of electrical engineering, Fang ultimately designed a 50-g, 6x5x1-cm device that can deliver the same stimulation parameters as the much larger stimulators first developed at Case Western Reserve.

The device incorporates a current driver that delivers charge-balanced, current-regulated, biphasic pulsed stimuli. A high-efficiency DC/DC converter generates the 40 V required to deliver the 20-mA, maximum-amplitude current pulses to a patient's muscle tissue (Figure 2). The current driver operates under the control of a low-power microcontroller. In addition, the microcontroller drives a digital-to-analog converter.

Figure 2 The RestoreStIM device incorporates a current driver that delivers charge-balanced, current-regulated, bipolar pulsed stimuli. A DC/DC converter generates the 40 V required to deliver the 20-mA current pulses.  Courtesy of NeuroControl.

When initiating treatment, a clinician enters the amplitude appropriate for the patient into the device, along with other patient-specific parameters, such as pulse width, pulse frequency, and duty cycle. Pulse width varies from 5 to 200 s and combines with amplitude to determine overall stimulus strength. To minimize patient fatigue, clinicians set pulse frequency to the lowest level (normally between 10 and 20 Hz) that produces the desired muscle contractions. They also program the stimulation duty cycle for each muscle—typically 10 s on and 10 s off, which can increase to 30 s on/10 s off as the treatment progresses.

A 3.4-V lithium battery powers the device, delivering about 300 hours of service. The device automatically shuts off when not in use, allowing a single battery to operate throughout the typical treatment regimen of six hours a day for six weeks.

Equipment at the bench

In developing RestoreStIM, the NeuroControl design team relied on conventional bench-level instruments for tasks ranging from analyzing power consumption to verifying pulse amplitude and duration. Among the most commonly used tools: an HP E3611A power supply, a Fluke 87III DMM, and a Tektronix TDS210 digital oscilloscope with Tek's YT5060 probe.

Figure 3 Development tests included frequent oscilloscope analysis of output waveforms from the stimulator to pinpoint problems in the circuitry. The cathodic pulse amplitude should be 20 mA (±2 mA), while the anodic pulse amplitude should be in the 0.4-to-0.7-mA range.

The engineers conducted frequent oscilloscope analysis of output waveforms from the stimulator, explains Pourmehdi, a PhD engineer who also did postgraduate work in FES technology at Case Western. By examining each portion of the waveform (cathodic pulse amplitude, anodic pulse amplitude, pulse duration, inter-pulse interval), the engineers can pinpoint which part of the circuitry may be failing (Figure 3). For instance, the cathode pulse amplitude under proper operation should be 20mA (± 2 mA). An amplitude outside this range indicates that either the DAC or the DC/DC converter has failed. In another example, the anodic pulse amplitude on the output waveform should be in the 0.4 to 0.7 mA range. An amplitude outside that range can indicate a bad current-limiting diode.

The oscilloscope, DMM, and power supplies also played a major role in verifying a circuit design that needed to boost power to 40 V, while reducing the noise level in the stimulation channels, maximizing battery efficiency, and delivering a low-current stimulus.

Although the device incorporates a transient voltage suppressor, the engineers still had to address electrostatic discharge (ESD), which might occur when a patient touches the stimulator's plastic housing. To address that problem, the engineers used a handheld ESD gun to ensure that the stimulator met the standards outlined under IEC 60601-1-2 (2001-09) for medical devices (Ref. 1). Under the standard, the device must withstand a 4-kV contact discharge and an 8-kV air discharge.

Fang notes that electromagnetic interference and emissions were less of a concern with this device, because it is a basic DC-powered pulse generator with no sensing capability. But to ensure compliance with EMC standards, the team turned to an outside lab, where technicians did spot an ESD problem: Zapping the metal screws on the stimulator housing pulled an arc that interrupted the microcontroller's operation. Solution: Substitute plastic screws.

By contrast, EMC issues played a much bigger role in another device that Fang and his team designed: A universal external controller for patients using the Freehand system. Among other things, this device monitors user inputs from positioning sensors and generates RF signals that power an implanted stimulator.

Outside the scope of electronics test, the device had to undergo prescribed drop tests of 1 m onto a hardwood floor to demonstrate both continued operation and safety. And during the design stage when using Orcad software for the circuit layout, the engineers had to maintain minimal air spacing of 2.4 mm between the plastic enclosure and the electronic components and traces to protect against short circuits from moisture or other contaminants.

On the manufacturing floor

To manufacture the RestoreStIM device, NeuroControl relied on a contract manufacturer, but the company's engineers set down a long litany of tests during production for such factors as battery life, insulation impedance, pulse duration, current, and pulse amplitude.

In addition, each device undergoes Hipot tests during manufacturing to meet IEC-60601-1 standards for dielectric strength. The concern here: Protecting the patient from shock that might occur when the stimulator is placed near a lamp or other device powered by AC current. Also related to patient safety are current-leakage tests, performed with DMMs. These tests ensure that, if any component fails within the circuit, it will not threaten patient safety. To protect against such leakage, the stimulator's design uses two capacitors in a series with the current pulse outputs.

Although technicians use microscopes to visually inspect such components as boards and electrode leads, Pourmehdi emphasizes the importance of environmental stress tests to guard against contamination sometimes found in boards supplied by outside vendors. Boards typically undergo 48 hours of testing in a Z-Series test chamber from Cincinnati Sub-Zero, with temperature/humidity cycles ranging from 5°C, 30% RH, to 50°C, 90% RH. "This is a very vital test for our type of operation," says Pourmehdi.

Among the problems detected by the environmental tests were instances of solder solution contamination under surface-mount components, which halted the stimulator's operation. In such instances, NeuroControl sometimes relies on outside labs to perform further failure analysis as a basis for manufacturing changes.

A huge opportunity

For NeuroControl, the many years of design and testing on RestoreStIM have yielded a device that could not only help thousands of patients annually, but also could establish the firm as an emerging leader in an estimated $100 million annual market for electrical therapy for pain relief and rehabilitation.

"We've talked to several large hospitals, and there is great interest among rehabilitation physicians in this device," says J.B. Richey, president and CEO of NeuroControl. "Current therapies too often fall short in relieving the terrible pain that these patients suffer."

The device is expected to cost patients about $3500, not including the one-hour procedure for the electrode implants, but major medical insurers have agreed on reimbursement.

NeuroControl and the clinicians who worked with the company to develop RestoreStIM also see the potential for using the same basic technology to design similar devices for treatment of other sources of chronic pain.

For the engineers who developed the stimulator, the project has brought tremendous satisfaction. "I was trained in electronics and physiology, and I've also been involved in clinical testing," says Fang, "and it is very rewarding to see engineering design help patients directly."

For more information

Maloney, Lawrence D., "A Bridge to Independence," Design News, March 6, 2000. p. 90. www.designnews.com.

Peckham, P. Hunter, et al., "An Advanced Neuroprosthesis for Restoration of Hand and Upper Arm Control Using an Implantable Controller," The Journal of Hand Surgery, March 2002. p. 265. www.jhandsurg.org.

Yu, David T., MD; John Chae, MD, ME; Maria Walker, MSE; and Zi-Ping Fang, PhD, "Percutaneous Intramuscular Electric Stimulation for the Treatment of Shoulder Subluxation and Pain in Patients with Chronic Hemiplegia," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, January 2001. p. 20. www.archives-pmr.org.


Author Information
Lawrence D. Maloney has been writing about business and technology for more than 30 years. He is the former deputy editor of US News & World Report and former editorial director of Design News, serving the design engineering community. He has a BA from the University of Notre Dame and master's degrees from Northwestern University and Georgetown University. E-mail: lmaloney@reedbusiness.com.


References
  1. IEC 60601-1-2 (2001-09), "Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and test," International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland. www.iec.ch.
 

Close-up of an FES innovation lab

NeuroControl's success in developing an effective electrical stimulation device for stroke therapy builds on more than three decades of breakthrough bioengineering research in Cleveland.

Spearheaded by Hunter Peckham, a PhD biomedical engineer, the research has brought together scores of engineers and clinicians from Case Western Reserve University, university hospitals, the Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and MetroHealth Medical Center. At the heart of the research: The design of functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems to improve the motor skills of patients paralyzed by spinal cord injuries.

On a recent T&MW visit to Case Western Reserve's FES Technical Development Lab, where many of the prototype devices are developed, Peckham discussed the role of testing in bringing the devices from idea to reality. He was joined by two long-time colleagues, electrical engineer Jim Buckett and physicist Fred Montague.

"In this lab, we don't have the luxury of making a large number of devices, and testing helps us get it right," said Peckham.

Among their current projects, Peckham and his associates are working on improvements to the Freehand system, which uses an implanted electrical stimulator and eight implanted electrodes to activate muscles in the hand and forearm. This enables paralyzed patients to grasp and release objects and perform other activities.

Figure A  The degree of droop and distortion in a DUT's test mode 1 waveform determines whether the device passes or fails.

Their design goals for the new Implantable Stimulator Transmitter (IST) family include new technology that will allow a greater range of movement and improved control over that of the original Freehand system. For example, a new system, which is scheduled for the first human implant this Spring, employs 12 implanted electrodes that enhance hand function and allow patients to reach for overhead objects. And rather than the cumbersome, shoulder-mounted exterior positioning sensor found in the early version of Freehand, the new system employs an implanted sensor array in the muscles of the forearm (Figure A). This new 12-channel myoelectric control technology uses signals from the voluntary muscles to provide user-generated commands to the external controller.

Explained Jim Buckett: "What this lab does is develop a toolbox of basic system components. We leave the end applications to the clinicians and rehab engineering teams. This is not product engineering."

A glimpse at the test arsenalHow does testing aid in the design of these FES systems? A tour of the FES Lab offered some perspective. Among the many devices that the engineers rely on to develop the stimulators, electrodes, and controllers found in the IST systems:

  • Haefely Model PESD 1600 ESD gun. "As these medical devices get smaller, they become even more susceptible to ESD," said Fred Montague. "ESD tolerance is one of the toughest test challenges because the implanted system is so hard to simulate in the lab." Over the past two years, the team has spent many weeks subjecting the devices to repeated charges from 1 kV to as high as 15 kV, checking each time for proper functionality in the stimulator and finding the "weak links" in the system.
  • PC tests. Using the lab's own proprietary software, a probing station, and a standard PC, Montague verifies the proper functioning of the implant by using an external RF transmitting coil, which is placed on the patient's upper chest over the implanted stimulator and powers the implant. "I'm looking to see if the internal electronics of the stimulator can tolerate the RF field, acquire reliable data and deliver the proper stimulus," said Montague. In the lab, engineers also use National Instruments' LabView software to simulate the implant.
  • Olympus SZ30 and BX60 microscopes. The SZ30 helps technicians inspect and fabricate electrode leads. The more powerful BX60 metallurgical microscope analyzes failures in leads, such as cracks and corrosion.
  • B&K Precision 1651 power supply. In lab experiments, the 1651 powers the external controller, which is linked to the RF transmitter coil that activates the implant. In early testing of the stimulator boards, DC power supplies also provided exact measurements of how much current the device was drawing.
  • Leakage current testers. These are used mostly for safety assurance on the stimulator's external controller. Using a high-vacuum system and mass spectrometer, Veeco's MS 40 helium leak detector looks for very fine leaks in the stimulator's hermetically sealed titanium housing.
  • LeCroy LT354M oscilloscope. With 12 channels of stimulus to monitor in the latest IST design, the scope helps control current levels in each channel and helps ensure that capacitors are recharged after each stimulus. The scope also aids the researchers in analyzing the RF envelope of the system's transmitter coil.
  • Wavetek 395 waveform generator. This 10-year-old instrument still works well in simulating signals coming from the muscles in the new myoelectric control system for the IST system. It also verifies resonant frequencies of external and implanted coils.
  • Precision 280 Series bath. Using a heated saline solution to mimic the hostile environment of the body, this equipment performs accelerated aging tests on the stimulator and other implanted components, while monitoring their functions.
  • Despatch 280 Series oven. Once stimulators pass leak tests for hermeticity, every unit going into a patient must undergo a two-week, mil-spec, burn-in test to screen out devices that might fail early on, primarily as a result of semiconductor defects. "You don't want to go in and do surgery to replace an implant after a year," said Montague.

ESD immunity is a major concern in implanted devices. The lab used a Haefely ESD gun to subject the devices to repeated charges as high as 15 kV. Courtesy of Haefely.

Besides these and many other lab tests, every implantable stimulator is checked out one last time in the operating room—before the patient is anesthetized. Technicians hook up the stimulator to a special testing station with an LED display. The RF transmitting coil is placed over the stimulator, and the LED signals verify proper functioning of the stimulus channels.

Buckett emphasized that still more tests await the lab's devices as they move out of the research and clinical trial stage, where engineers operate under the FDA's investigational device exemption (IDE), and into volume commercial production. These tests include the FDA's Good Manufacturing Practices, as well as tests to ensure compliance with tough FCC standards on RFI emissions for Freehand.

How important is test to the future of FES research? Peckham noted that getting test equipment needed by his researchers is a key concern in nearly every research grant that the Cleveland FES Center applies for. Currently, the Center receives more than $7 million annually, mostly from the Department of Veterans Affairs and the National Institutes of Health.

"We do a lot of hand fabrication in this lab," said Peckham, "and our approach is to design, build, and test. I'd say we spend about half of our time doing some type of testing. You can't really do good design without knowing how you're going to test it."

Partners in Test

Here's a list of some key test products found in the labs of the engineers featured in this article:

Agilent power supplies www.agilent.com

B&K Precision power supplies www.bkprecision.com

Cincinnati Sub-Zero environmental chambers cszinc.com

Despatch burn-in ovens www.despatch.com

Fluke DMMs www.fluke.com

Haefely ESD guns www.haefely.com

LeCroy oscilloscopes www.lecroy.com

National Instruments software www.ni.com

Olympus microscopes www.olympus.com

Precision baths www.precisionsci.com

Tektronix oscilloscopes and probes www.tektronix.com

Veeco helium leak detectors www.veeco.com

Wavetek waveform generators www.metermantesttools.com

 

For patients, a measure of relief

In May 2001, Kenneth Huml suffered a debilitating stroke—and, a few months later, severe shoulder pain.

Kenneth Huml. "Zero pain." Courtesy of NeuroControl.

After trying medications and heating pads, Huml opted for the RestoreStIM treatment during clinical trials for the device. "After my treatment, my pain level went from a six—the worst pain I can imagine is 10—to a zero. No pain. I also now have almost full range of motion with no pain."

"Now I am pain free," says another recovering stroke victim, Robin Beard. Before her treatment with RestoreStIM, she recalls that "I don't think there is a number high enough to represent the pain I was in."

For such patients, this new electrical stimulation treatment involves a simple one-hour, pain-free outpatient procedure. After administering a local anesthetic in the patient's shoulder area, a physical medicine and rehabilitation therapist uses a 19-gauge needle to insert into the shoulder muscles four coiled electrodes consisting of stainless steel wire with a medical-grade Teflon insulation. The tip of each electrode features a charge-delivery surface of 10 mm2. Lead wires from the electrodes join with a connector assembly on the upper arm, with cables linked in turn to the external, pager-sized stimulator.

A week after the implant procedure, the physician programs the stimulator for the therapy regimen, which typically involves six hours of stimulation a day for six weeks. Most patients wear the stimulator in a shirt pocket, or clipped to their belt, so they can go about their daily activities.


Some tips on selecting test chambers

Environmental testing played an important part in quality assurance on the NeuroControl's RestoreStIM system for pain-relief therapy, but test chambers also prove useful for a wide variety of products. These include: power supplies, disk drives, air-bag modules, speakers, cell phones, batteries, and respirators. FromCincinnati Sub-Zero, manufacturer of the Z-Series chamber used by NeuroControl, comes this checklist for choosing a system:

  • Temperature.  Determine the range needed for both current and future testing. For example, CSZ offers chambers with temperatures ranging from -73C to +190C.

  • Humidity.  An atomizing humidity system--ranging from 10% to 95% RH--may be best if your product generates a large amount of live load/heat into the chamber. But you my need a steam generator system--10% to 98% RH--if the product does not generate a large amount of live load.

  • Airflow.  CSZ recommends that the interior of the chamber consist of 1/3 product and 2/3 empty space optimum performance.    

  • Air conditioning . Verify that your facility has an HVAC system sufficient to support the amount of heat the chamber will reject into the lab. A typical air-cooled chamber rejects approximately 9000 – 12,000 btu/hr of heat.

  • Electricity and water . Don't underestimate utility requirements for environmental chambers.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts

Blogs

  • Martin Rowe
    Rowe's and Columns

    August 11, 2008
    Grachanen wins NCSLI award
    At last week's NCSL International Workshop and Symposium, Chris Grachanen was awarded the NCSLI Educ...
    More
  • Martin Rowe
    Rowe's and Columns

    August 8, 2008
    Have you seen Test Ideas?
    The August print issue of T&MW features a new column called "Test Ideas." For this fir...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Test Industry News (3 Times Per Month)
Machine-Vision & Inspection (Monthly)
Communications Test (Monthly)
Design, Test & Yield (Monthly)
Automotive, Aerospace & Defense (Monthly)
Instrumentation (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites