Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

See you later, simulator?

Brad Thompson, Contributing Technical Editor -- Test & Measurement World, 5/1/2003

Once upon a time, a recent mechanical engineering graduate decided to improve operation of the power plant where he worked. Using simulation software, the ME devised improvements that, as he proudly pointed out to his supervisor, would increase thermal efficiency to over 99%.

"That's fine," replied the crusty old supervisor, "but at 10 degrees Fahrenheit, that recirculated water is going to be mighty rough on the feed pump."

(Electrical engineers can be similarly and disastrously dazzled by simulation.)

Didja hear the one about the EE who didn't know about bypass capacitors leading to a product crisis requiring a major printed circuit board redesign? The board's developer, a newly graduated EE, used circuit-simulation software to perfect the microprocessor, memory, I/O, and glue logic, but he neglected to add any bypass capacitors to his board. My friend, who witnessed this episode, wonders whether the newbie engineer assumed that a technician would take care of those messy analog-related details that the digital simulator ignored.

In kinder, gentler, and more prosperous times, employers offered newly graduated EEs hands-on practical experience via apprenticeships or deliberate rotations through several departments. Today, employers want cheap labor in the form of new grads already knowledgeable in a particular specialty who can hit the ground running.

In college, software simulators offer students quick exploration of complex designs. Inexpensive student-grade simulators, however, can't easily cope with design elements that aren't supposed to be present (such as power plane inductance and capacitance, or intercircuit stray coupling). Worse yet, curricula that rely heavily on simulation software may offer little or no hands-on exposure to practical electronics. Students won't know what they're missing.

Although today's jam-packed EE curriculum won't make it easy, educators could make the presentation of a suitably complex, functional, and physical analog and digital project a prerequisite for graduation.

Why should test engineers worry about over-reliance on circuit simulation and the disappearance of hands-on electronics? Because we have to cope with, and guarantee performance of, half-baked products that may only "sort of" work. Besides, would you want your appendix removed by a simulator-trained surgeon holding a scalpel for the first time?

Brad Thompson, Contributing Technical Editor, brad@tmworld.com

 

What they're saying

"Either we educate electrical engineers to appreciate the intellectual (real world equivalent circuit) reasons for certain design underpinnings, whether they be bypassing or wire sizes...or we continue toward a split in the ranks, where the overly 'virtual' engineers have the high profile, and a class of technician-engineers toil to render safe the overly virtual designs. A split in status among the employed would probably correlate with a split in the status of engineering schools. Or maybe it is the beginning of a new kind of 'OSHA' inspection needed within engineering: 'Oh, yeah, Joe there is an old veteran. These days he mostly goes around and checks on missing bypass capacitors.'"

Private communication from Peter J. Kindlmann, adjunct professor, director of undergraduate studies and the Morse Teaching Center, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

What they said

"If bypass condensers are needed anywhere in a circuit there is no advantage, but rather a disadvantage, in using a large capacitance. As the author showed in an article in The Wireless World (September 29, 1933), there is an optimum capacitance for every frequency, being that to neutralize the inductance of the connections...."

Source: Radio Laboratory Handbook, by M. G. Scroggie, 2nd ed., Iliffe & Sons, Dorset House, London, 1944.

What they're doing

Sequence Design of Santa Clara, CA, has announced the availability of CoolTime, a software package that performs instantaneous current and voltage-drop analysis, taking into account power grid capacitance, onchip decoupling capacitors, and package inductance. CoolTime examines both power and ground networks simultaneously to account for ground bounce and power grid resonance.

Available in Q2 2003, the software's annual license fee is $150,000 per seat. www.sequencedesign.com .

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts

Blogs

  • Martin Rowe
    Rowe's and Columns

    August 11, 2008
    Grachanen wins NCSLI award
    At last week's NCSL International Workshop and Symposium, Chris Grachanen was awarded the NCSLI Educ...
    More
  • Martin Rowe
    Rowe's and Columns

    August 8, 2008
    Have you seen Test Ideas?
    The August print issue of T&MW features a new column called "Test Ideas." For this fir...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Test Industry News (3 Times Per Month)
Machine-Vision & Inspection (Monthly)
Communications Test (Monthly)
Design, Test & Yield (Monthly)
Automotive, Aerospace & Defense (Monthly)
Instrumentation (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites