Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Testing EEPROM-calibrated mixed-signal ICs

Rick Nelson, Executive Editor -- Test & Measurement World, 9/1/2003

Traditionally, semiconductor manufacturers used Zener- and link-trimming to calibrate parameters such as output voltage on analog ICs. They performed the trimming at the wafer level, using additional pads designed specifically for the purpose. The trimming process effectively locked an IC's target parameter, making reversal (or recalibration) almost impossible.

Mixed-signal MOS devices such as this one used EEPROM cells to store calibration data.

The emergence of mixed-signal MOS ICs presents an effective alternative to traditional trimming. MOS devices can accommodate EEPROM cells that can store calibration data; so, at final test, a test system can determine the necessary calibrations and program the cells accordingly. This method permits multiple, reversible trim operations at the wafer or package level. National Semiconductor (Santa Clara, CA; www.national.com) has applied this approach to its LM78 system health monitor (which was designed for the company's CS100 process) and has subsequently extended it to LM70, LM74, and LM77 digital temperature sensors (fabricated in the CS65 process).

Initial efforts in applying this approach included indirect test of the EEPROM cells themselves. This indirect approach involved read/write cycling EEPROM bits, programming each bit, baking the wafers, and, at final test, looking for any parametric drift that would suggest that EEPROM calibration data didn't survive the wafer-bake stage. With this approach, however, least-significant-bit EEPROM-cell failures could result in test escapes or poor process yields.

A direct EEPROM test approach overcomes this drawback, providing for direct data-retention test at the package level. In this approach, a final-test system looks for wafer-level data, whose presence would indicate a good device. If the tester doesn't find that data, it performs a trim-parameter test to determine whether it is re-testing a previously programmed good device. Finally, the tester attempts to reprogram rejected devices with the original wafer-level data to facilitate later retest. A single test program can accommodate fresh and rejected as well as good but previously programmed devices.

To learn more, read a paper by C.H. Lim of National Semiconductor at www.tmworld.com/EEPROMcal.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts

Blogs

  • Rick Nelson
    Taking the Measure

    June 25, 2008
    CEOs address proposed Credence, LTX integration
    Credence and LTX complement each other with respect to customers, product lines, facilities, and emp...
    More
  • Rick Nelson
    Taking the Measure

    June 23, 2008
    Credence, LTX plan merger, rationalization ahead
    Credence and LTX yesterday announced plans to merge (see related story), leading to product-line rat...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Test Industry News (3 Times Per Month)
Machine-Vision & Inspection (Monthly)
Communications Test (Monthly)
Design, Test & Yield (Monthly)
Automotive, Aerospace & Defense (Monthly)
Instrumentation (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites