Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

There's no place like space

Engineers at General Dynamics C4 Systems test transponders under conditions that are out of this world.

Martin Rowe, Senior Technical Editor -- Test & Measurement World, 9/1/2004

Calibrations at C4 Systems

SCOTTSDALE, AZ—"In space, no one can hear you scream," says the promotion for the 1979 movie Alien. Humans, though, aren't alone in finding inhospitable conditions once they leave Earth. The lack of atmosphere that prevents your voice from carrying also affects how electronics operate—and it is just one of the harsh conditions that electronics face in space. Thus, engineers must test for every conceivable environmental condition before launching a spacecraft.

 
Test leader Joe Irman oversees all testing of SDSTs and other equipment.
Engineers at General Dynamics C4 Systems (www.gdds.com/space) develop and test communications systems for space missions. They subject their systems to the extremely low pressure, wide temperature swings, and lack of humidity that occur in space. They also test for vibration and shock conditions that occur during and just after launch. This kind of testing has produced reliable communications systems such as those on Voyager, which still sends signals to Earth after 27 years in space (www.jpl.nasa.gov/voyager).

Since its beginnings as a division of Motorola, General Dynamics C4 Systems has sent communications electronics into space for more than 50 years, starting with the Redstone missile in July 1950. The division employs more than 7000 people and has its headquarters in Scottsdale.

The Scottsdale campus houses an operation devoted to space-based communications. It manufactures the Small Deep Space Transponder (SDST; www.gdds.com/space/products/transponders.html). SDSTs collect telemetry data from scientific instruments on the spacecraft and modulate the digital signals onto a carrier in the X-Band or Ka-Band (Ref. 1). The SDST, which sells for $1.5 million, first flew in the 1998 Deep Space One mission. Two SDSTs are currently on Mars, and other missions are planned into 2006 (Table 1 ).

Because each mission an SDST flies is unique, each mission has different test requirements. The customer, NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL; www.jpl.nasa.gov), specifies the tests, which take several weeks to run.

 
Project leader Keith Siemsen oversees development of the Small Deep Space Trasnponder.
Upon receiving test requirements from JPL, systems engineers at General Dynamics develop a compliance matrix that documents the responsibilities of the design, analysis, and test groups. The test group is responsible for testing the SDST in every mode that it will use during a flight. "You can't operate a spacecraft in a mode that's not tested," said senior staff engineer and project leader Keith Siemsen, "so we must test for all possible conditions."

Rolling racks

General Dynamics' engineers develop a custom test rack for each SDST. Figure 1 shows the series of tests that engineers perform. They test each transponder before, during, and after subjecting it to each environmental condition.

Environmental test equipment such as shock testers, vibration testers, and thermal vacuum chambers reside in different rooms. Therefore, a test rack follows its transponder around the building. Test leader Joe Orman noted, "A test rack follows its transponder so that we can run all tests with the same calibrated instruments." An in-house calibration lab keeps the test equipment within tolerance. (See "Calibrations at C4 Systems," below.)

 
Figure 1. Each Small Deep Space Transponder goes through a series of environmental tests. A dedicated test system measures its performance throughout the tests.
Before an SDST is completely assembled, its components undergo five temperature cycles from -40°C to +60°C while unpowered. Then, the modules undergo the same temperature cycles while powered.

Once fully assembled, the SDST undergoes a full functional test at 25°C in the transponder lab. That provides engineers with a baseline level of performance. A test suite includes measurements on a downlink's transmitter power and frequency, uplink sensitivity, bit-error rate (BER), and subcarrier modulation levels. (A downlink is a spacecraft-to-Earth communications channel.) Table 2 provides a list of equipment in the test rack and the tests each instrument performs.

In the uplink-sensitivity test, for example, the test system must calibrate uplink carrier power. The SDST measures and digitizes its received carrier power level and sends that information back to Earth over the downlink; this tells engineers on Earth how much signal power is reaching the SDST so they can determine whether it is strong enough to maintain control of the unit. A software script in the tester processes the digitized uplink signal power, displays its level on the computer screen, and calibrates the link power to the proper levels.

Software engineer Dave Andersen developed test software in Agilent Vee (www.agilent.com/find/vee) that performs the functional tests. His software controls the test equipment, simulates control signals from Earth, and simulates digital telemetry from onboard instruments. A modular software design lets him use the same software architecture for every SDST even though the test parameters change from mission to mission. "With the automated test systems," said Andersen, "tests that used to take three hours manually now take three minutes."

After an SDST completes functional baseline testing, it makes a journey through several environmental test labs. The unit's test rack goes along for the ride, testing the unit at each stop. 

In the EMI lab, an SDST undergoes emissions and immunity tests. Engineers verify that it won't interfere with other spacecraft systems and that it's immune to outside interference. The tests are specific to the mission and aren't subject to the usual regulations because the SDST operates in space, where compliance regulations don't apply.

 
Software engineer Dave Andersen writes software to control equipment that tests spacecraft communications systems.
Launch vibes

All equipment that goes into space must first survive a launch and a stage separation. Environmental test lab manager Tom Lullo uses an Unholtz-Dickie (www.udco.com) vibration table to simulate launch conditions. He runs random-vibration tests for 1-min to 3-min periods at frequencies from 20 Hz to 2000 Hz.

Lullo says that a 1-min test simulates a normal launch but he tests the first piece for each mission for 3 min, just to be sure it will work. He also runs 3-min vibration test at double the power (+3 dB) of the amplitude of the 1-min tests. During vibration tests, the test rack measures an SDST's DC current draw, output power, phase noise, and receiver BER. A subset of the tests, which checks the most critical functions of the unit, are performed immediately before and after subjecting a transponder to each axis of vibration.

Triaxial accelerometers on the vibration table monitor the vibration during a test. Lullo also uses the vibration data to monitor the table's performance. By tracking the vibration profiles, he can detect potential problems in the vibration table before they occur.

Vibration occurs during a launch, then quickly subsides. But a spacecraft also must endure shock forces when a rocket's stages separate. (The bolts that hold stages together get blown off with explosives to force separation.) Shock tests subject an SDST to forces up to 2000 g with acceleration frequencies up to 1 kHz. To perform this test, engineers place the SDST on a shock table. A hydraulically driven rod hammers the table, thus producing the shock.

When a spacecraft such as a Mars Rover reaches its destination planet, all of its components must survive the shock and vibration of a landing. As each Rover approached the Martian surface, airbags inflated just before the vehicle detached from its parachute. The Rover then free-fell to the surface and rolled inside the airbags to a stop. To simulate the impact and roll of the landing the SDST would encounter in the Rover, General Dynamics' engineers subjected the transponder to a series of 150-Hz sine-wave bursts of five vibration cycles each.

No cool

After completing shock and vibration tests, an SDST goes into a thermal vacuum chamber that simulates conditions in space. A thermal vacuum chamber uses a mechanical pump to remove most of its air. It then uses a cryogenic pump to reduce its internal pressure to below 10-5 Torr, measured with an ion gauge. After reaching that pressure, the chamber remains sealed for three weeks while its temperature cycles from -40°C to +60°C. The test rack runs the full suite of functional tests 24 hrs a day at the temperature extremes.

The lack of atmosphere in space not only prevents you from hearing a scream but also prevents the cooling of electronic equipment. "In space, there's no atmosphere to convectively cool electronic components," noted Siemsen. "Heat can build up, and we must test a transponder's ability to conductively transfer heat through the SDST's frame to the spacecraft's thermal heat sink."

A lack of atmosphere produces other problems, too. Under extremely low pressure and without humidity, electrical discharges caused by corona problems can damage electronic components. The thermal vacuum chambers let engineers test the SDST for arcing under reduced atmospheric pressure in zero humidity. But because the SDST must withstand humidity until the spacecraft leaves the atmosphere, the engineers also perform humidity tests at full atmospheric pressure.

Throughout the environmental tests, General Dynamics' engineers collect and analyze data. They look for trends that can reveal potential problems. After all environmental tests are complete, the engineers run a full suite of tests at 25°C. They look for differences in performance that may indicate how the SDST will perform on a mission.

When the engineers have completed their testing, the SDST is delivered to JPL for compatibility testing. Only after JPL engineers verify that the SDST is compatible with the JPL communications network is it ready for spacecraft integration. T&MW


References
  1. X-Band uplink frequency is 7.145 GHz to 7.235 GHz. Downlink frequency is 8.400 GHz to 8.500 GHz. Ka-Band downlink frequency range is 31.800 GHz to 32.300 GHz. Source: Small Deep Space Transponder data sheet, www.gdds.com/space/download/sdst.pdf.

Table 1. Deep-space missions containing equipment from General Dynamics C4 Systems
Mission name Destination Launch date Arrival date Web site
Deep Space One asteroid/comet fly by October 1998 September 2001 nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1
Mars 2001 Odyssey Mars (orbiter) April 2001 October 2001 mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/
Space Infrared Telescope Facility (Spitzer Space Telescope) Sun orbit trailing Earth to image deep space objects August 2003 December 2003 www.spitzer.caltech.edu
Mars Exploration Rover (Spirit) Mars June 2003 January 2004 marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov
Mars ExplorationRover (Opportunity) Mars July 2003 January 2004 marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov
Deep Impact comet penetrator December 2004 July 2005 deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov
Messenger (Mercury Surface, Space Environment, Geochemistry and Ranging) mission Mercury orbiter August 2004 March 2011 messenger.jhuapl.edu
Dawn asteroids Vesta and Ceres (orbiter) June 2006 Vesta: October 2011 Ceres: August 2015 dawn.jpl.nasa.gov and www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/dawn
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Mars (orbiter) August 2005 March 2006 marsprogram.jpl. nasa.gov/mro/
Stereo (Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory) Sun orbit trailing and leading Earth to image Sun February 2006 mid-2006 stereo.jhuapl.edu

Table 2. SDST test station equipment
Description Assignment
Frequency counter Downlink frequency
Power meter Exciter power
Power meter Test transmitter
Digital oscilloscope Waveforms
Spectrum analyzer Uplink and downlink
DMM Current measurements
DMM Voltage measurements
Synthesizer/func. gen. Ranging modulation
Synthesizer/sig. gen. Uplink source
DC power supply 28-VDC source
Distribution amplifier 10-MHz amplifier
Frequency counter Uplink frequency
Selective level meter Ranging response
Signal generator 76-MHz test oscillator

 

Calibrations at C4 Systems

Headed by Dan Tomlinson, the metrology lab at General Dynamics C4 Systems performs more than 16,000 calibrations per year on 10,300 pieces of equipment, including scopes, DMMs, spectrum analyzers, and vector-network analyzers. The lab is compliant with ANSI Z540, and customers such as NASA and Boeing regularly audit the lab's procedures and equipment.

Tomlinson explained that he uses an outside company to manage the calibration schedules for the thousands of instruments in the Scottsdale facility. "With better management, we've dropped test-equipment purchases by two-thirds," he reported. "When an asset is underutilized, we sell it if we don't need it for legacy applications."

The lab also maintains numerous primary standards that calibrate the calibration equipment in Scottsdale. Primary standards go to NIST (www.nist.gov) for calibration.

As is typical of metrologists, lab supervisor Greg Pearce doesn't trust a standard until it has proven its stability. During my visit, I saw a Fluke DC voltage standard that metrologists were characterizing—a process that can take as long as three years. Once metrologists collect enough data on a standard to put it into use, it may remain in service for many years. Pearce noted that the lab still has capacitance-standards built by General Radio in 1957.

For more about Communications Test, visit www.tmworld.com/comm.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts

Blogs

  • Rick Nelson
    TAKING THE MEASURE

    July 1, 2008
    S-parameters are so yesterday
    Textbook amplifiers operate in linear mode and are easy to analyze. Unfortunately, it’s often ...
    More
  • Rick Nelson
    Taking the Measure

    June 30, 2008
    Cell phones helping cell phones
    Now, I’m leery of the phrase “paradigm shift,” which is often applied to increment...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Test Industry News (3 Times Per Month)
Machine-Vision & Inspection (Monthly)
Communications Test (Monthly)
Design, Test & Yield (Monthly)
Automotive, Aerospace & Defense (Monthly)
Instrumentation (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites