Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

The best-laid boards

Steve Scheiber, Contributing Technical Editor -- Test & Measurement World, 4/1/2005

For many years, board designers have endured the litany of the test industry—design for testability, permit visibility to internal circuit logic, provide access, access, access. When most boards included nodes on the underside, DFT guidelines concentrated on ensuring that all of them were available for contact by a bed of nails. When circuit density and levels of integration made following that recommendation increasingly difficult, the industry came up with an alternative—boundary scan. Hailed as a panacea (at least when it could be effectively implemented), it was touted as imperative by loud voices in the industry.We should have known better. There are no panaceas. At the International Test Conference last October, a panel discussion explored a dissenting opinion—that designing a circuit with boundary scan makes even encrypted data more vulnerable to hackers and fellow travelers (Ref 1).

 
Encoding and decoding logic within the boundary-scan chain will prevent outside access.
Increasingly, today's electronics are used in secure operations—banking, personal-data collection, credit card transactions, and so on. Manufacturers must also protect their intellectual property from theft or compromise. At some point, the Internet carries information from all of these applications across town or around the world. If designers diligently follow DFT guidelines and incorporate boundary scan widely in their creations, how do we protect that information from unauthorized access?

Eliminating boundary scan is not an answer. The need for test generation, adequate fault coverage and defect detection, and identification leave designers with little alternative.

So what do we do?

Rohit Kapur of Synopsys calls on designers to encode and decode logic within the scan chain to prevent anyone from exercising the circuit without the proper codes (Ref. 2). Louis Ungar, president of ATE Solutions, suggests simply stopping the boundary-scan chain short of the edge connector; he recommends that manufacturers provide a node near the edge that can be probed but cannot be accessed from within the target system.

Protecting future products from this vulnerability is imperative. Yet, design-security recommendations will not address the millions of scan-based products already in the field. Replacing them will take time for normal equipment turnover. Companies and the industry at large must explore ways to combat this type of hacking.

sscheiber@aol.com


References
  1. Marinissen, Erik Jan, moderator, "Security vs. Test Quality: Can We Really Only Have One at a Time?" Proceedings of the International Test Conference, 2004. p. 1411. www.ieee.org.
  2. Kapur, Rohit, "Security vs. Test Quality: Are they mutually exclusive?" Proceedings of the International Test Conference, 2004. p. 1414. www.ieee.org.
  •  

    Mixed-signal tester gets new features

    Board manufacturers and repair facilities can extend the effectiveness of test protocols from S790 mixed-signal testers with the new S790 Series2 from DiagnoSYS. Key to the system's effectiveness is the Computer Aided Test Engineering software, which lets users develop test programs that combine functional, in-circuit, boundary scan, mixed-signal, and bus emulation for a complete board test. www.diagnosys.com.


    Test platform combines multiple strategies

    Seica has introduced the VIVA Integrated Platform, which helps manufacturers address the challenges of board test at the design, production, and field-service stages. The new platform combines digital-signal processing and synthetic instruments with test-development software to optimize test-development time, fault coverage, and test time. www.seica.com.


    JTAG test system bundled with board tester

    Asset Intertech has incorporated its ScanWorks JTAG test system into Agilent's i5000 board-test system. Agilent will bundle ScanWorks into its Medalist in-circuit test product line along with its own Interconnect Plus boundary-scan tool and Silicon Nails, which works with boundary-scan chains to test non-boundary-scan devices. Users can migrate tests from a ScanWorks station in the design lab to manufacturing, where they can merge the tests with Silicon Nails tests. www.asset-intertech.com; www.agilent.com.

    Email
    Print
    Reprint
    Learn RSS

    Talkback

    We would love your feedback!

    Post a comment

    » VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

    Related Content

    Related Content

     

    By This Author

    Sponsored Links



     
    Advertisement
    SPONSORED LINKS

    More Content

    • Blogs
    • Podcasts

    Blogs

    • Martin Rowe
      Rowe's and Columns

      July 22, 2008
      Disposable test equipment
      While visiting a company for an upcoming T&MW print article, I heard an engineer talk about high...
      More
    • Martin Rowe
      Rowe's and Columns

      July 16, 2008
      Oscilloscope frustrations
      The other day, a reader e-mailed me about his oscilloscope frustrations. "I use my oscilloscope...
      More
    • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

    Podcasts

    Advertisements





    NEWSLETTERS
    Click on a title below to learn more.

    Test Industry News (3 Times Per Month)
    Machine-Vision & Inspection (Monthly)
    Communications Test (Monthly)
    Design, Test & Yield (Monthly)
    Automotive, Aerospace & Defense (Monthly)
    Instrumentation (Monthly)
    Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
    ©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
    Please visit these other Reed Business sites