Protocol stack testing for LTE
Effective test strategies can help transform UMTS into a cellular wideband system.
By Christina Geßner, Rohde & Schwarz -- Test & Measurement World, 6/1/2008

Producers of mobile phones and mobile infrastructure are working on the next big step in the development of the universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS): UMTS long term evolution (LTE). The new standard will ensure that UMTS remains competitive while giving users enhanced mobile Internet access. The first commercial LTE networks could be in place by 2010, and LTE standardization is progressing as part of Release 8 from the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Manufacturers, therefore, will soon need suitable test capability to verify their LTE products.
| See a glossary of the abbreviations used in this article. |
LTE networks must provide downlink data rates of higher than 100 Mbps and uplink rates of higher than 50 Mbps. They must also significantly reduce the latency times for packet transmissions so users won't experience unacceptable delays. To achieve these goals, the 3GPP is defining new air-interface transmission methods and is also revamping the protocol and network architecture of UMTS.
Where UMTS used wideband code-division multiple access (WCDMA) for transmitting signals, the LTE downlink uses orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA), which is particularly robust when handling the varying propagation conditions seen in mobile radio. The LTE uplink will employ single-carrier frequency-division multiple access (SC-FDMA), which can be considered a precoded OFDMA.
Another significant feature of LTE is its high bandwidth—up to 20 MHz. Because the usable bandwidth is scalable, LTE can also operate in the existing 5-MHz UMTS frequency bands, or in even smaller bands. Developers of LTE base stations and wireless devices must also account for a very short latency time; LTE has a transmission time interval of only 1 ms between data packets.
LTE systems can also employ multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna systems. In one MIMO technique, multiple antennas can transmit the same data stream to improve data-transmission reliability, resulting in diversity gain. In another, the different antennas can transmit different data streams simultaneously to increase throughput; this method is called spatial multiplexing and results in multiplexing gain. Spatial multiplexing is necessary to achieve the greater than 100-Mbps data rates in the downlink direction.
An LTE base station can have up to four transmit antennas, and an LTE wireless device will have up to four receive antennas. Initial implementations will probably consist of 2x2 systems—that is, two antennas on the transmit end and two on the receive end.
The protocol architecture of LTEThe 3GPP is completely reworking the network and protocol architecture of UMTS so LTE can support high data rates and short latency times. LTE is a purely packet-oriented technology developed in accordance with the 3GPP's System Architecture Evolution (SAE) effort. LTE uses a minimal network architecture to reduce latency time. Figure 1 provides an overview of the LTE network elements and their interfaces. The LTE base station, or eNodeB (eNB), initiates connections on the air interface. It also assigns air-interface resources and performs scheduling.
![]() Figure 1. In an LTE network, a base station (eNB) connects to a core network via the S1 interface. Multiple eNBs connect to each other via the X2 interface (not shown). |
Each LTE base station connects to the core network through the 3GPP-defined S1 interface. The base stations themselves are interconnected via the X2 interface so they can initiate and complete actions such as handovers. As a result, the radio network controller (RNC) previously used in UMTS is no longer needed, which significantly reduces the number of internal interfaces in the network. The eNB basically assumes the functions previously handled by the RNC.
Figure 2 shows the protocol architecture for the user plane and control plane. The layer-1 and layer-2 protocols of the air interface terminate in the wireless device and in the eNB. The layer-2 protocols include the medium access control (MAC) protocol, the radio link control (RLC) protocol, and the packet data convergence protocol (PDCP). The layer-3 radio resource control (RRC) protocol also terminates in both the wireless device and the base station. The protocols of the non-access stratum (NAS) in the control plane terminate in the wireless device and in the mobility management entity (MME) of the core network.

Figure 2. In the LTE protocol architecture for user plane (top) and control plane (bottom), layer-1 and layer-2 air-interface protocols terminate in the wireless device and in the eNB. The layer-2 protocols include the MAC protocol, the RLC protocol, and the PDCP. The layer-3 RRC protocol also terminates in both the wireless device and the base station. The protocols of the NAS in the control plane terminate in the wireless device and in the MME of the core network.
Many of the procedures used for UMTS have been simplified for LTE. For example, LTE employs the shared-channel principle, which provides multiple users with dynamic access to the air interface. In contrast to the conventional circuit-switched operation, the packet-oriented LTE network does not assign resources to a user for the entire duration of a connection. Instead, the base station gives the user a resource on the shared channel only when a data packet is to be transmitted. During transmission pauses, the resource can be assigned to other subscribers. The dedicated channels used in GSM and UMTS are thus no longer needed, greatly simplifying the LTE protocol architecture and ensuring efficient use of the resources on the air interface.
The addition of procedures for link adaptation further improves the performance of the shared channels. With link adaptation, the base station selects the optimum modulation and coding scheme based on the connection quality. The base station also makes frequency-dependent scheduling decisions, such as whether a user would have better connection quality in a specific range of bandwidths.
The scheduling mechanism is therefore complex and if not properly implanted can significantly degrade the performance of the LTE system. The stringent timing requirements are of particular importance because the base station makes a scheduling decision every millisecond.
LTE differs from UMTS in dispensing with the compressed mode of WCDMA, which allows a wireless device to take measurements on other frequencies or radio technologies to optimize call quality and to facilitate handovers. For this purpose, data transmission is compressed so that the wireless device can find gaps for performing measurements. This method is relatively complex to implement. Because LTE doesn't use compressed WCDMA, the base station is responsible for providing individual subscribers with the necessary pauses for these measurements.
An important aspect, particularly from the point of view of network operators, is the integration of LTE into established mobile radio networks. In addition to GSM/GPRS and the existing UMTS networks, these include networks that are based on WiMAX and CDMA2000. To ensure the successful handover of calls from LTE networks to ones based on other technologies, the 3GPP specifies suitable handover mechanisms.
Protocol tests for LTE devicesDuring the early stages of development of LTE-capable chipsets and wireless devices, engineers should perform protocol tests as well as a functional test to ensure that the functioning of the protocols on the air interface complies with the 3GPP LTE specifications. Engineers should also address performance aspects, such as whether the product can handle the high-data-rate requirements of LTE.
Depending on the degree of integration, you can use various approaches for performing protocol tests. Several test-equipment manufacturers offer test instruments that include software-based LTE protocol testers. If a layer-1 implementation is not yet available, or integration has not yet taken place, you can use this software to perform a virtual test of the protocol software. In the R&S CMW500 for LTE, for example, the test software emulates the behavior of the protocols on the network end. Developers can connect the protocol stack to be tested to a virtual tester via an IP connection. LTE test scenarios then verify the behavior of the protocol stack on the wireless device end. These scenarios can include a simple connection setup or more complex reconfigurations. All important functions of the layer-2 and layer-3 protocols can be verified in the virtual test environment of the CMW500, for example.
After layer-1 integration, you can connect the wireless device or chipset to a bench protocol tester for further testing. The connection can take place via RF or in the baseband—for example, over a digital I/Q interface. You can then subject the device under test (DUT) to the LTE test cases to study the behavior of the device and detect possible errors.
When moving to the hardware version of a protocol tester, developers can reuse the scenarios from the virtual-test environment. The R&S CMW500 for LTE also provides test cases that include layer-1 functionality. Of particular interest are the test cases that require an interaction between the downlink and uplink, such as MIMO or the hybrid automatic repeat request (ARQ) protocol.
For throughput measurements, connection to the user plane—for example, to a video streaming server—is important. Actual user data can thus be processed in the protocol test scenario. LTE devices must be able to work with other technologies, as LTE services will not be rolled out everywhere simultaneously.
Test scenarios for developmentWhen testing LTE devices in R&D, engineers should use a flexible programming language like C++ so they can develop numerous complex test scenarios. A distinction is made between the low-level application programming interface (LLAPI) and the medium-level application programming interface (MLAPI), depending on whether the interface accesses layer 2 or layer 3.
The LLAPI offers users particular flexibility for programming layer 2 of the network simulator. Plus, the LLAPI is available early on as it does not require a layer-3 implementation. (The 3GPP is still working on the specification of LTE layer 3.)
![]() Figure 3. A message composer can help you specify the contents of layer-3 messages that are used in a test scenario. These messages can perform functions such as setting up a connection. |
On the other hand, the MLAPI is a particularly efficient method because the user does not have to configure layers 1 and 2 on the tester end; layer 3 handles that automatically. The user only needs to specify the desired sequence of the protocol test scenario, plus the contents of the layer-3 messages, for example, for setting up the connection.
Figure 3 illustrates the use of the R&S CMW500 for LTE instrument for editing messages. State machines allow the scenarios to be set up modularly, so that individual components can easily be reused. Figure 4, generated by the CMW500 message-analyzer function, shows every message exchanged between a tester and a DUT.
![]() Figure 4. A message analyzer can show every message exchanged between the tester and the DUT. |
The first LTE-capable wireless devices will soon be tested in real networks. To comprehensively prepare for these field trials, producers of chipsets and wireless devices will need to perform interoperability tests to completely test a wireless device in the lab and prepare for all test cases in the field. As a result, implementation errors can be detected early on and surprises avoided. If problems do still occur during the field trial, the scenarios can be reproduced in the lab by using the protocol tester, and the implementation error can then be eliminated from the chipset or wireless device.
3GPP is currently working on test specifications for LTE. In addition to test cases for RF and radio resource management, the 3GPP will develop numerous signaling test cases. These will include layer-2 and layer-3 test cases, as well as NAS test cases. The 3GPP will describe these test cases in testing and test control notation version 3 (TTCN-3). The conformance test cases specified in 3GPP will form the foundation for the certification of wireless devices, ensuring that all wireless devices worldwide comply with the same standards.
LTE involves many technical changes for UMTS. Developers of LTE-capable chipsets and wireless devices must therefore carry out numerous protocol tests to detect errors in the implementation early on, thus saving time and money. The interworking between LTE and other radio technologies will be a particularly important task in protocol testing.
| Abbreviations | |
| 3GPP | 3rd Generation Partnership Project |
| ARQ | automatic repeat request |
| eNB | E-UTRAN NodeB base station |
| EPC | evolved packet core |
| E-UTRAN | evolved UMTS terrestrial radio access network |
| LLAPI | low-level application programming interface |
| LTE | long term evolution |
| MAC | medium access control |
| MLAPI | medium-level application programming interface |
| MME | mobility management entity |
| NAS | non-access stratum |
| PDCP | packet data convergence protocol |
| PDN | packet data network |
| P-GW | PDN gateway |
| PHY | physical |
| RB | radio bearer |
| RLC | radio link control |
| RRC | radio resource control |
| RRM | radio resource management |
| S-GW | serving gateway |
| TTCN-3 | testing and test control notation version 3 |
| UE | user equipment |
| UMTS | Universal Mobile Telecommunications System |
| Author Information |
| Christina Geßner has been a technology manager for mobile radios at Rohde & Schwarz headquarters in Munich since 2004. Her tasks include the development and marketing of the T&M product portfolio for UMTS LTE and HSPA. After completing her studies in electrical engineering with emphasis on radio-frequency engineering at the University of Hannover in 1998, Geßner first worked in the strategic product management of the mobile radio networks division at Siemens in Berlin and Munich. |
Talkback
Related Content
Related Content
Sponsored Links
TMW Resource Center
Browse Resources by Type:
- Evaluating Oscilloscopes for Best Signal Visibility: How to Increase Your Odds of Finding Infrequent Glitches
Agilent Technologies | Application Note
VIEW NOW
Agilent Technologies | Web Event
VIEW NOW
Tektronix | Web Event
VIEW NOW





















View More