Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Taking the Measure   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (3)


Energy harvesting: micro and macro
April 9, 2008

Have you heard about the thermoelectric generator for which your head can serve as its own power source for an EEG monitor? At room temperature, the internal thermopiles of the energy harvester can generate about 2 to 2.5mW, as Margery Conner reported in a post from October.

She reports today that the generator has now been augmented with solar panels to compensate for limited power-generation capability when ambient temperature approaches body temperature.

But what if you are looking to harvest solar energy on a grand scale—for example, in quantities sufficient to meet all US energy needs. The “Ask Pablo” column in Salon tackled this problem earlier this week in response to this question: “I've read in more than one place that 100 square miles of solar panels in the U.S. would meet all our energy needs. Wondering if you thought this was accurate and, if so, achievable?”

Pablo’s response, in part: “At 12,000 kWh per capita, electricity demand is roughly 3.6 trillion kWh…. To generate 3.6 trillion kWh per year, we would need to install about 12.5 billion square meters of solar panels, or around 4883 square miles.”

There must be 5000 square miles of unused desert somewhere around here, but that’s not the main problem, Pablo suggests: “A typical solar panel contains between 800 and 1570 grams of silicon…per square meter. If we assume an average of 1185 grams, we would need 14,812,500 metric tons of solar-grade silicon. The projected annual production of silicon by 2012 is 144,000 metric tons, which means that it would take over 100 years to meet our needs of silicon to make all those solar panels!”

In conjunction with Semicon West last year, I reported on the efforts of the semiconductor industry to address solar power in the post titled “Semi industry can help solar power.” But I guess the semi industry needs to pick up the pace.


Posted by Rick Nelson on April 9, 2008 | Comments (3)


April 12, 2008
In response to: Energy harvesting: micro and macro
Paul H. commented:

I was in a debate with someone a couple weeks ago about the impracticality of 100% solar energy for the US. I wish I would have had this info then to back up my argument.




April 15, 2008
In response to: Energy harvesting: micro and macro
Meredith Poor commented:

It's easier to grasp 5000 square miles by describing it as 70 miles x 70 miles. A typical county is 40 miles x 40 miles (although in the real world they're often smaller). Four counties, each 35 x 35 miles, would provide enough surface area. If a typical homeowner needs 1Mwh per month, this is 30Kwh per day, which divided by 5 (hours per day of equivalent maximum exposure) is 6kw generating capacity. At a yield of 200 watts per square meter, this is 30 square meters, or 330 square feet. Tripling this for mid-summer AC scenarios still leaves lots of room on most people's rooftops.




July 3, 2008
In response to: Energy harvesting: micro and macro
Rick D commented:

It might be more efficient to have all of that energy production in one 70x70 mile area but of course we would need to spread it out for security reasons and also have enough sites so that if one (or more) went down for any reason we would have back-up, but then maybe wind, wave and other sources would cover that.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement



Advertisements






©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites