Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Taking the Measure   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (4)


Resistance to GM’s Volt
April 23, 2008

Holman W. Jenkins Jr. can’t decide “whether GM is a genius or a dolt for developing the Volt.” The Wall Street Journal columnist writes today, “America's biggest near-dead car company called in reporters this month to boast—boast!—about its willingness to lose money on its forthcoming electric car.” Jenkins says GM told the reporters it would deliver a plug-in Volt by 2010, “Whatever it takes….”

What it would take are batteries with sufficient power-to-weight ratio and life expectancy. Jenkins reports that “GM says it has a battery package in hand, and will have to squeeze 10 years of testing into two to make its schedule.” But, he adds, cost is no object, paraphrasing GM vice chairman Bob Lutz as saying that “GM intends to beat Toyota at its own game of selling bogus green symbolism to Washington and Hollywood.”

One would think that stakeholders, whatever their political leanings, would be resistant to selling “bogus green symbolism” at a huge loss. But Jenkins detects a motive. GM, he suggests, will “throw its lobbying clout behind a final set of CAFE rules designed to disadvantage its rivals.” It will bribe customers to drive money-losing Volts off the lot in order to offset the higher fuel consumption of its bigger, more powerful, and profitable vehicles.

See related post, "Hummer vs. hybrid."


Posted by Rick Nelson on April 23, 2008 | Comments (4)


April 23, 2008
In response to: Resistance to GM’s Volt
Meredith Poor commented:

Of course, there's no discussion of price. A pure EV circa 2010 will have an interesting price point if gas is costing $4.00 per gallon (already true in some places). The other factor is the price of power at that point (8 to 15 cents per KWH?). This is likely to change, perhaps severely. American consumers are getting used to reduced purchasing power, including in particular how often and far they drive. GM may be able to bundle some kind of 'insurance' that basically makes a bet on energy costs over the life of the car. Either that, or consumers should buy (or sell) certificates based on their relative impact in the energy markets.




April 25, 2008
In response to: Resistance to GM’s Volt
HybridJim commented:

Want to see a neat idea? zeropollutionmotors.us Runs primarily on compressed air. 106 MPG! Seats 6. Available in US in 2010 at estimated $18K. For now, we're happy with our 60 MPG (real data) Prius.




April 25, 2008
In response to: Resistance to GM’s Volt
Dave commented:

Ok, here's an idea: Solar panels only deliver power when the sun is shining. In some ( not all ) states, you can sell the power back to the electricity utility. This is a solution to the problem of "how do you store the energy from solar panels". However, there is the efficiency loss in converting to AC then the poor payback from the utility company, then the efficiency loss in charging your plug-in vehicle. Plus, the electric utility has to handle the variable ( minute by minute ) supply from solar, which is not an issue if the percentage of solar is infinitessimal, but will be an issue if it became a significant percentage of power generation during the day. An alternative solution which might make both plug-in electric vehicls AND solar panels more appealing is have the plug-in vehicle be capable of recharging off solar panels. Manging the variable power from the panels could be handled by the charging system for the car. Shove a few solar panels on top of the garage/carport and voila: lower transport costs. Now, if I could just get the company to put charging station car-ports in the parking lot...




April 25, 2008
In response to: Resistance to GM’s Volt
Chris PE commented:

All I can say from the point of someone ,who spent most of his life with electric and electronic devices is this: WE HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE!!!! Can anyone ever think that oil prices are just a financial TERRORISM!!!WE HAVE to be smart and go electric and with todays progress in batteries....just think for one gallon of gasoline you can buy a cell phone battery (wholesale),which can be RECHARGED!!!!!!!Oil lobby is very,very strong , but we need to change it.As far as energy cost , I think that it will not go up severly , unless GREED comes into play.After all evening and night(when the cars shold be charged) have surplus energy , so all electric energy companies will be happy....I am for a change.Cars started as electric and they should come back to that nice quiet and efficient form of energy.That's my opinion.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement



Advertisements






©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites