Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Taking the Measure   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (5)


The trifecta that almost everyone loses
April 28, 2008

The era of cheap goods is ending—that’s the view from sources ranging from a variety of observers. I reported recently that Alexandra Harney attributes the rise in prices to the rise of labor costs in China. Now, in the Sunday Boston Globe, Prasannan Parthasarathi, an associate professor of history at Boston College, and Juliet Schor, a sociology professor at BC and a board member of newdream.org, say other factors are involved as well in the fact that, as they put it, “Seemingly overnight, $19 DVD players, trendy T-shirts for $3.99, and $49 fares on Southwest have given way to $3 loaves of bread, $5 gallons of milk, and gas on its way to $4 a gallon…We're betting the trifecta of ecological limits, the unequal distribution of wealth, and the legacy of bad policy will end the era of cheap goods.”

Evidence they point to for each part of this trifecta include continually rising carbon emissions, striking hungry workers in Vietnam, and US retailers’ rationing of rice. “The new price trends are troubling for a majority of the globe's citizens, who, unless they can translate their numbers into political power, will bear the lion's share of what looks so far to be a painful ecological adjustment,” they write.

Their call to action to mitigate the effects of rising prices? “…broad-based reforms that cushion higher prices for basic needs by putting more purchasing power into lower-income hands, expand secure access to sustainable food sources, and provide climate-friendly power and transport.”


Posted by Rick Nelson on April 28, 2008 | Comments (5)


April 28, 2008
In response to: The trifecta that almost everyone loses
Meredith Poor commented:

The first thing they teach you in economics: "Rising prices are a signal to enter the market". Ecology has nothing to do with it. Deferred investment in infrastructure, however, is another matter entirely. As an aside: one might remember the terraced rice paddies on the hillsides of the Philippines. Look at recent satellite photos to see if they still exist. That kind of farming has been abandoned, and most of the kids of those families are now looking for work in the big cities.




April 28, 2008
In response to: The trifecta that almost everyone loses
RobS commented:

Wow - you're a true socialist, Rick. Your solution to rising prices is further income redistribution and government intervention in the transportation and energy industries. If a little bit of a bad thing causes issues, maybe ALOT will solve the problem. Hint: Lower taxes, limit government expenditures, reduce regulations on people and industry, and get the government out of economic micromanagement. Argue all you like, but the problems will continue to get worse until these solutions are implemented.




April 28, 2008
In response to: The trifecta that almost everyone loses
Kirk commented:

Wasting resources on wars is certainly a good way to make these problems worse.




April 29, 2008
In response to: The trifecta that almost everyone loses
Bill Cuthbert commented:

Let us all start by ceasing the silly habit of putting labels on sensible solutions. Never mind right or left wing politics - the world needs us all to pull together. Only politics, dogma and self interest gets in the way of real solutions and progress.




April 29, 2008
In response to: The trifecta that almost everyone loses
desert rat commented:

Looks to me like we are entering a Malthusian cycle, and we all know how those turn out. Aside from rice, look at corn for a moment. Farmers sell their corn to ethanol producers as we stumble spastically into renewable energy possibilities, and that reduces the supply of corn for food. People are rioting in the streets in Mexico because of the price of tortillas now, one of the unintended consequences of the eco-terrorist-driven politically-correct Kumbaya movement. The population of this planet has been growing geometrically and unchecked for many decades. That is pressuring the food supply, which grows arithmetically (not to mention energy costs playing a big part). Wars, famine, disease are all mechanisms that get the population back into balance with the food supply. A redistribution of the wealth by liberals and socialists will not divert Mr Malthus from his appointed rounds.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement



Advertisements






©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites