Global TMW:
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Taking the Measure   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (3)


And then there were four?
August 16, 2005

The semiconductor test industry may have one fewer player soon, depending on the disposition of the Agilent Technologies' ATE divisions--specifically, its SOC and memory test businesses--which the company announced it wants to spin off "as soon as practical in 2006." The reason? The company believes investors look askance at anything with the word "semiconductor" involved.

Consequently, the semiconductor test businesses will follow out the door two other divisions: the Semiconductor Products segment, which Agilent is selling to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and Silver Lake Partners for $2.66 billion, and its portion of the Lumileds LED business, with Agilent is selling to Royal Philips Electronics for $950 million (plus repayment of $50 million of debt from Lumileds).

The Wall Street Journal reports that Kohlberg Kravis and Silver Lake said they plan to establish the semiconductor products segment as a privately held, independent concern. Dick Chang, president of the Agilent semiconductor business, will serve as president and chief executive of the new company, the Journal reports.)

The fate of the ATE business isn't clear at this point, with most observers agreeing that the world needs fewer, not more, big-iron ATE makers (including Advantest, Credence Systems, LTX, and Teradyne). Can the Agilent ATE business go it alone, or will a cash-strapped competitor find a way to fund an acquisition?

And how will Agilent itself fare as a "pure test-and-measurement play," no longer bogged down by the "semiconductor" label? Investors may come to realize that most of the items being tested and measured by Agilent equipment have semiconductors in them.


Posted by Rick Nelson on August 16, 2005 | Comments (3)


August 17, 2005
In response to: And then there were four?
Roy Tan commented:

Four Main ATE Companies? AT, Credence, LTX, Teradyne Question: Which of the so-called Big-four was profitable the last 2-3 years? Answer: Only AT Agilent:- Potential: Good. As shown in Prime research data, its market share and growth within the last 3 years has been growing at a slow and very steady pace. This is very consistent. Main revenue: High-end RF and SoC segment. Main product: 93000. New strategy: To gain market share in the Flash memory market segment meaning a direct challeng to AT's market capitalisation. Question: Does Agilent ATE has the financial clout to develop new products and employ top R&D resources? Yes if it is still part of the Agilent conglomerate and its board is willing to be in the red the next few years. Possible returns: Gain market share in the Flash business with major flash memory producers. Product offerings: V5400 for probe testing and V5500 for final testing. Question: Would it better for Agilent ATE to spin-off first then attract potential buyers? Would it be a good idea for a cash-strapped ATE competitor to purchase Agilent? This means lots of re-structuring and consolidation especially common target market products and integration of culture(if any differences) and resources. What if a 'new' ATE player springs up and purchase Agilent ATE? Possible? Best regards, Roy




August 25, 2005
In response to: And then there were four?
Lenny commented:

By dividing up Agilent, the stockholder will be happy. The shaky semi stocks and the mild mannered manufacturing and test tools, now called measurement, are somewhat opposed. By getting back to its roots, Agilent is better equiped, as the STE group sucked up half the energy of the execs without providing the comfort or profits expected. They will keep a portion certainly and so they can still have their hooks into semi without being into the pit of semi test. The move is brilliant.




May 17, 2006
In response to: And then there were four?
power of attorney commented:

Very good site.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement



Advertisements






©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites