Subscribe to Test & Measurement World
RSS
Email
Average Rating:
  • (1)
    Rate this:
  • Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff

    October 6, 2009

    I’ve been critical of behind-the-wheel multitasking and would highly recommend that people not talk or text while driving or operating trains, buses, or trolleys. But I doubt that legislation would be effective in preventing the practice.

    Legislation would be much preferable, however, to the truly bizarre suggestion of Mark A. Shiffrin, a lawyer and former consumer protection commissioner for Connecticut, and Avi Silberschatz, chairman of the computer science department at Yale. In a column titled “Thumbs on the Wheel” in the New York Times, they concede that “…the way to stop people from using cellphones while driving is not to make it a crime.” Their suggestion: “A more effective approach is to get telecommunications companies to tweak technology to make it difficult or impossible to text and drive.”

    Essentially, they want to disable cell-tower handoff. That’s a bad idea on many fronts. First, it would just force a driver talking on his cell phone to redial every few minutes as he speeds down the highway (Shiffrin and Silberschatz do suggest a three-minute delay before a handed-off phone can redial.) It would prevent passengers from using their phones, although they do say “…it is also easy to imagine technology that would allow only passengers to use their phones—by tethering them to devices, placed on the passenger side of the car, that would override the system.” All I can imagine is a driver with a foot on the gas and one hand on the steering wheel leaning over to the passenger side to pull the enabled, tethered handset to his ear. But worst, their scheme would affect people who take trains and buses—especially those who do so in order to get extra work done.

    The right approach is not a technical one in this case. The right approach is education, plus stiff punishment for drivers whose recklessness causes accidents.

    Posted by Rick Nelson on October 6, 2009 | Comments (6)
    Average Rating:
  • (1)
    Rate this:

  • October 6, 2009
    In response to: Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff
    JRL commented:

    interesting story told to me by someone in the highway patrol....
    found a closet hanger tangle up in a steering wheel of a car that had wreaked on a straight stretch of road...
    While mumbling aloud (how did that get there?)...
    the surviving driver explained:
    "oh , that is not the result of the crash, I put it there to hold my book!"
    legislate all you want... people have been doing "stupid" while driving .... regardless of technology .


    October 6, 2009
    In response to: Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff
    Policebox commented:

    No! Fine them $10,000 and take the CAR! If someone is so stupid as to use anything but a hands free device (and I have seen with my own eyes someone typing on a laptop while driving) we need to get them off the road and cripple their ability to get back.


    October 6, 2009
    In response to: Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff
    Bandini commented:

    Forget all that. Let's educate that drunk drivers have been KILLING ~5100 INNOCENT folks every year for years and years (data "buried" in FWSA and FARS reports). Everything else pales and simply ignores the 40% cause of all highway CRASHES. (They're NOT "accidents". signed CIDD.


    October 6, 2009
    In response to: Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff
    M commented:

    Why do we need more legislation for this. Don't states already have laws against driving distracted. This is nothing more than politicians trying to get press coverage.


    October 6, 2009
    In response to: Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff
    Bill commented:

    Simple solution: Fine them $1000 and take the phone!


    October 6, 2009
    In response to: Down with texting while driving, but save the handoff
    John commented:

    I was shocked by the technical ignorance of the writers of the editorial : you would think the head of CompSci at Yale would know something about how cellular networks work. Aside from being completely impractical, it still doesn't solve the problems of drivers distracted by eating, passengers, sleep depravation, etc. Shame on the Times for publishing such a piece of ----.

    POST A COMMENT
    Display Name
    captcha

    Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription
    © 2011 UBM Electronics . All rights reserved.
    Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    Feedback Form
    Feedback Analytics