Subscribe to Test & Measurement World
RSS
Email
Average Rating:
  • (5)
    Rate this:
  • (Mr) Rogers PCB

    November 10, 2011

    Our first PCB post discussed the issues of using FR4 material, concluding with the hopes of using Rogers material for its low loss properties. This week, we’ll take a look at our newest test jig that was fabricated using Rogers material. For 10GBASE-T physical layer testing (IEEE 802.3 Clause 55), we created a test jig that converts a CAT6A Ethernet jack to SMA connectors (named the OctoBoard). The board is made of Rogers RO4350B material which is more expensive than FR4, but is much less lossy. This is critical when testing high speed technologies like 10GBASE-T. Designing a board using Rogers material was a tedious task as many different constraints had to be accounted for such as the dielectric constant (3.66 vs. FR4’s 4.5), inner/outer layer thickness, the laminate core thickness, and the bonding ply thickness which all differ from FR4. All of these parameters yielded a trace thickness twice that of a FR4 design for 50 ohm impedance.

    We use side launch SMA connectors that use a pad width of 20 mils for the conductor, which matches the 20 mil trace width from our previous FR4 designs. Since the trace width for Rogers design is ~40 mils we had to taper the trace width from the SMA pads. As we don’t have a software package to simulate the effects of changing the trace width, we created a prototype board using Rogers material. The prototype board has different trace tapering designs and we measured the insertion loss of each trace design to find the optimal taper method to be used on the OctoBoard.

    10GBASE-T Octoboard

    10GBASE-T Octoboard

    We were pleased to find that the differential insertion loss of a single pair on the OctoBoard is extremely flat out to 3 GHz which is sufficient for testing 10GBASE-T. The 10GBASE-T OctoBoard is shown above. The graph below shows the insertion loss of Pair A, which is two Octoboards connected with a short CAT6A cable.

    Differential Insertion Loss on Pair A

    Differential Insertion Loss on Pair A

    digi.png

    Michael DeGaetano, Research and Development

    Posted by UNH-IOL Staff on November 10, 2011 | Comments (1)
    Industries: Communications Test
    Average Rating:
  • (5)
    Rate this:

  • November 23, 2011
    In response to: (Mr) Rogers PCB
    Larry C commented:

    Nicely done Mr. Mike, your test fixtures rock !
    Octoboard ... Octomom ...
    [ BTW on our boards we don't open the solder mask so far across, with the end-launch SMAs; ]
    Stay warm my friend.

    POST A COMMENT
    Display Name
    captcha

    Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription
    © 2011 UBM Electronics . All rights reserved.
    Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    Feedback Form
    Feedback Analytics